NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Secondary decision view: valuation · portfolio context · the data you need before acting on a single-source signal.
Avoid rule-based

NVIDIA Corporation shows risk signals — avoid for now.

Verdict bucket from deterministic rule (validation / floor distance / risk alerts). LLM narration only — never picks the bucket.

BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal

Sign in to set your floor price for NVDA and unlock the buy-zone decision summary.
Sign in

Macro context

Across past macro events, NVDA 5d reaction has been net positive +2.2%
13 event categories · 107 samples · 57 up / 43 down · macro-beta evidence only
Per-category detail · macro beta breakdown
fed-fomc-rate-cycle → avg 5d +4.4% 12 samples · 7 up / 3 down
taiwan-strait-tension → avg 5d +0.5% 12 samples · 6 up / 6 down
oil-shock → avg 5d -1.2% 10 samples · 3 up / 6 down
us-china-tariff-escalation → avg 5d +0.6% 10 samples · 5 up / 4 down
big-ipo-event → avg 5d +1.3% 9 samples · 5 up / 3 down
bank-crisis → avg 5d +5.3% 8 samples · 5 up / 2 down
big-tech-earnings-shock → avg 5d +8.6% 7 samples · 5 up / 1 down
election-uncertainty → avg 5d +3.4% 7 samples · 3 up / 4 down
natural-disaster → avg 5d +3.9% 7 samples · 5 up / 2 down
pandemic-emergency → avg 5d +2.5% 7 samples · 6 up / 1 down
sovereign-debt-crisis → avg 5d +1.2% 7 samples · 3 up / 4 down
china-property-crisis → avg 5d +2.6% 6 samples · 3 up / 3 down
russia-ukraine-war → avg 5d -5.3% 5 samples · 1 up / 4 down
Vs sector ETF (XLK, 5d)
+3.3pp leading sector
NVDA +7.2% Sector benchmark XLK +3.9%
Macro-beta evidence: how this ticker historically reacted to broad macro shocks. Not a thesis-level call — for that, you have to read the news and decide.

RULES & ALERTS FIRING

Sign in to see which rules are firing on NVDA in your portfolio.
Sign in

VALUATION

Neutral
🔥 Extreme-low valuation flag — historical bands suggest this ticker is unusually cheap relative to its own 5-year range.
Trailing P/E
34.2
5-yr percentile: 72%
P/B
27.8
5-yr percentile: 9%
p10
7.3
p25
9.3
p50
13.5
p75
41.0
p90
56.2
Large PE vs PB percentile gap — possibly due to dramatic earnings shifts distorting PE. Consider Forward PE and growth expectations.

Floor Engine

AI Valuation Recommendation single method
Floor
USD 105.45
Golden
USD 137.08
How we derived this
Floor USD 105.45历史峰值(ATH) × (1 − 50%) 回撤。原因:场景方法选举出的底价远低于当前价(< 40%),引擎判断这些方法的历史样本已被过时的定价区间主导(典型 re-rated 股票),回退到一个对 wheel/options 仓位更可执行的回撤型底价。

Golden USD 137.08ATH × (1 − 35%)(同一回撤方法,更浅档位)。

注:下方场景卡片显示的 DIVIDEND/VALUATION/EPV 数字是引擎仍计算了但未采纳的原始候选 — 保留可见以便审视引擎判断。
External Cross-Check
Our AI Floor USD 105.45
Analyst Low Target (58 brokers) USD 180.00
Analyst Mean Target USD 302.83
5-Year Low USD 12.11
✓ 我们的 floor 比分析师低端低 41%(在合理区间内)。AI Floor 设计上就是『深度便宜』的价位,低于分析师 12 个月目标低端属于预期之内。
AI Synthesis
分析师评论指出,NVDA在增长调整后估值看似便宜(PEG比率为0.20),但96%的盈利增长已充分计入当前估值,安全边际有限。基于高增长/高波动性股票的特性及现有估值方法的适用性限制,我们采用历史回撤模型。该模型以历史峰值(ATH)为基准,通过50%的回撤计算得到估值地板价为**$105.45** (ATH × 0.50)。同时,以65%的回撤计算得到黄金价格为**$137.08** (ATH × 0.65)。当前估值置信度为低。
Updated 2026-08-03
Glossary (click to expand)
Forward P/E
P/E using analysts' next-12-month EPS estimates. More forward-looking than trailing P/E, but exposed to forecast error.
Trailing P/E
P/E using actual EPS from the last 12 months. Distorted by one-time events (asset sales, impairments) until they roll out of the window.
P/B (Price-to-Book)
Stock price / book value per share. Meaningful for asset-driven sectors (banks, insurers); high values are normal for asset-light sectors (tech, consumer).
PEG
P/E ÷ earnings growth rate — \"how much P/E you pay per 1% of growth\". <1 = cheap-ish, >2 = priced-in.
Regime-mismatch drawdown model
When P/E distribution undergoes a structural shift (business transformation, sector re-rating), traditional \"revert to historical P/E percentile\" misleads. This model uses historical max drawdown × current EPS instead.
EPV (Earnings Power Value)
Greenwald framework: assume zero growth + current earning power is sustainable. Yields a conservative lower bound (asset + franchise value).
Heuristic Fallback
Backup estimator used when the primary method (P/E percentile, yield reversion, etc.) is unreliable due to data issues. **Lower confidence** — reference only, not auto-execute.
Confidence
Primary method applicable → high; multiple methods agree → medium; single heuristic fallback → low. Low confidence means review before acting.
Alt Method USD 223.96 Confidence low
STRESS DRAWDOWN medium
USD 83.27
Stress floor: if last 5y max drawdown repeats from current price (re-rating-immune)
High-growth, historical multiples re-rated — stress floor (current_price × (1−max 5y drawdown))

YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT

○ anonymous
What you'll see after sign-in
Your floor
$XXX.XX
Your golden
$XXX.XX
Market
XXX

· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price

· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds

· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio

Sign in to unlock →

IMPLIED VOLATILITY

CURRENT IV 29.8% HV (30D) 39.1% IV RANK (1Y) 23 LOW
IV vs HV · last 1 year

Earnings Reactions

NVDA
8 earnings events · last 2 years
Avg Gap%
+1.35%
Avg Day%
-2.78%
Up Hit Rate
50%
Next Earnings · est.
2026-08-26
in 17d
24-08
24-11
25-02
25-05
25-08
25-11
26-02
26-05
Bar height = |Gap%| normalized to the period max. Green = up, red = down.
Date Time EPS Surprise Gap% Day% Week%
2026-05-20 AMC 1.87 +5.5% -0.53% -1.77% -5.52%
2026-02-25 AMC 1.62 +5.3% -0.66% -5.46% -6.25%
2025-11-19 AMC 1.30 +3.5% +5.06% -3.15% -5.10%
2025-08-27 AMC 1.05 +4.1% -0.43% -0.79% -8.03%
2025-05-28 AMC 0.81 +8.0% +5.52% +3.25% +3.84%
2025-02-26 AMC 0.89 +5.2% +2.83% -8.48% -15.78%
2024-11-20 AMC 0.81 +8.5% +2.37% +0.53% -5.24%
2024-08-28 AMC 0.68 +5.7% -3.38% -6.38% -18.14%

Is NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) overvalued right now?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is currently trading at a trailing P/E of 34.2, sitting at the 72th percentile of its 5-year valuation history. A high percentile suggests the market is pricing the stock above its own historical norm — useful context before sizing a new position or selling premium against it.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?

Selling cash-secured puts on NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) — which option strategy fits your view?

If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) — is now a good entry?

Entry timing on NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.

FAQ

Why does NVDA show different P/E numbers on different sites?

Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.

Does this page show NVDA's implied volatility?

Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.

How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's NVDA page?

Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.