ENB (ENB)

Secondary decision view: valuation · portfolio context · the data you need before acting on a single-source signal.
Watch rule-based

ENB is near the buy zone but not triggered — watch.

  • Cross-source data disagrees — verify against raw figures.
Verdict bucket from deterministic rule (validation / floor distance / risk alerts). LLM narration only — never picks the bucket.

BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal

Sign in to set your floor price for ENB and unlock the buy-zone decision summary.
Sign in

Macro context

Across past macro events, ENB 5d reaction has been net positive +0.9%
13 event categories · 107 samples · 56 up / 30 down · macro-beta evidence only
Per-category detail · macro beta breakdown
fed-fomc-rate-cycle → avg 5d +0.3% 12 samples · 5 up / 5 down
taiwan-strait-tension → avg 5d +0.9% 12 samples · 7 up / 3 down
oil-shock → avg 5d +3.1% 10 samples · 7 up / 2 down
us-china-tariff-escalation → avg 5d +0.5% 10 samples · 4 up / 2 down
big-ipo-event → avg 5d -0.2% 9 samples · 3 up / 4 down
bank-crisis → avg 5d +1.3% 8 samples · 4 up / 2 down
big-tech-earnings-shock → avg 5d +2.2% 7 samples · 5 up / 1 down
election-uncertainty → avg 5d +2.1% 7 samples · 5 up / 1 down
natural-disaster → avg 5d +1.2% 7 samples · 5 up / 1 down
pandemic-emergency → avg 5d -1.0% 7 samples · 3 up / 2 down
sovereign-debt-crisis → avg 5d +0.2% 7 samples · 3 up / 3 down
china-property-crisis → avg 5d +0.3% 6 samples · 3 up / 3 down
russia-ukraine-war → avg 5d +0.1% 5 samples · 2 up / 1 down
Vs sector ETF (XLE, 5d)
-2.7pp lagging sector
ENB +0.4% Sector benchmark XLE +3.1%
Macro-beta evidence: how this ticker historically reacted to broad macro shocks. Not a thesis-level call — for that, you have to read the news and decide.

RULES & ALERTS FIRING

Sign in to see which rules are firing on ENB in your portfolio.
Sign in

VALUATION

Undervalued Minor data-source discrepancy — does not affect trend analysisⓘ
Trailing P/E
21.3
5-yr percentile: 18%
P/B
2.0
5-yr percentile: 28%
p10
16.3
p25
18.1
p50
19.5
p75
20.8
p90
21.4
Sufficient earnings data; P/E historical percentile directly measures overvaluation or undervaluation

Floor Engine

AI Valuation Recommendation
Floor
USD 27.00
Golden
USD 35.10
How we derived this
Floor USD 27.00 = 历史峰值(ATH) × (1 − 50%) 回撤。原因:场景方法选举出的底价远低于当前价(< 40%),引擎判断这些方法的历史样本已被过时的定价区间主导(典型 re-rated 股票),回退到一个对 wheel/options 仓位更可执行的回撤型底价。

Golden USD 35.10 = ATH × (1 − 35%)(同一回撤方法,更浅档位)。

注:下方场景卡片显示的 DIVIDEND/VALUATION/EPV 数字是引擎仍计算了但未采纳的原始候选 — 保留可见以便审视引擎判断。
External Cross-Check
Our AI Floor USD 27.00
Analyst Low Target (5 brokers) USD 44.72
Analyst Mean Target USD 51.06
5-Year Low USD 26.94
✓ 我们的 floor 比分析师低端低 40%(在合理区间内)。AI Floor 设计上就是『深度便宜』的价位,低于分析师 12 个月目标低端属于预期之内。
AI Synthesis
根据分析师评论,ENB 目前估值偏高,远期市盈率 22.5 倍,市净率处于历史 100% 分位,市场已充分计入 295% 的盈利增长,缺乏安全边际,主要风险在于估值回归历史低位。在此背景下,基于 ATH 历史峰值回撤的估值模型显示,ENB 的黄金价格为 $35.1,底部价格为 $27.0。这意味着在市场回归历史估值或出现回撤时,这些价格可能提供支撑。该估值信心度为 'low'。
Updated 2026-10-05
Glossary (click to expand)
Forward P/E
P/E using analysts' next-12-month EPS estimates. More forward-looking than trailing P/E, but exposed to forecast error.
Trailing P/E
P/E using actual EPS from the last 12 months. Distorted by one-time events (asset sales, impairments) until they roll out of the window.
P/B (Price-to-Book)
Stock price / book value per share. Meaningful for asset-driven sectors (banks, insurers); high values are normal for asset-light sectors (tech, consumer).
PEG
P/E ÷ earnings growth rate — \"how much P/E you pay per 1% of growth\". <1 = cheap-ish, >2 = priced-in.
Regime-mismatch drawdown model
When P/E distribution undergoes a structural shift (business transformation, sector re-rating), traditional \"revert to historical P/E percentile\" misleads. This model uses historical max drawdown × current EPS instead.
EPV (Earnings Power Value)
Greenwald framework: assume zero growth + current earning power is sustainable. Yields a conservative lower bound (asset + franchise value).
Heuristic Fallback
Backup estimator used when the primary method (P/E percentile, yield reversion, etc.) is unreliable due to data issues. **Lower confidence** — reference only, not auto-execute.
Confidence
Primary method applicable → high; multiple methods agree → medium; single heuristic fallback → low. Low confidence means review before acting.
partial weak USD 45.89 Confidence low
VALUATION low ⓘ
—
method skipped: insufficient PE history (11 months, need 60)
PE reverts to historical 5th-percentile (extreme undervaluation)
PB medium ⓘ
USD 20.49
P/B reverts to historical 10th-percentile (asset-driven businesses)
CYCLICAL PE ★ medium ⓘ
USD 40.55
PE reverts to historical 30th-percentile (cyclicals; 30th not 5th to avoid trough-bias)
Energy/materials cyclical — uses 30th-pct PE to avoid trough-bias

YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT

○ anonymous
What you'll see after sign-in
Your floor
$XXX.XX
Your golden
$XXX.XX
Market
XXX

· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price

· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds

· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio

Sign in to unlock →

IMPLIED VOLATILITY

CURRENT IV 33.9% HV (30D) 16.3% IV RANK (1Y) 96 HIGH
IV vs HV · last 1 year

Earnings Reactions

ENB
8 earnings events · last 2 years
Avg Gap%
+0.38%
Avg Day%
+0.09%
Up Hit Rate
62%
Next Earnings · est.
2026-11-06
in 29d
24-11
25-02
25-05
25-08
25-11
26-02
26-05
26-07
Bar height = |Gap%| normalized to the period max. Green = up, red = down.
Date Time EPS Surprise Gap% Day% Week%
2026-07-31 BMO 0.63 +5.6% -0.09% -1.75% -7.49%
2026-05-08 BMO 0.98 +4.7% +0.76% -0.74% +2.44%
2026-02-13 BMO 0.88 +13.1% +1.27% +3.94% +0.98%
2025-11-07 BMO 0.46 -9.8% -1.62% +1.77% +2.13%
2025-08-01 BMO 0.65 +14.3% +1.13% +2.01% +3.75%
2025-05-09 BMO 1.03 +7.9% +1.40% +0.70% -2.03%
2025-02-14 BMO 0.75 +1.4% -0.77% -5.24% -8.60%
2024-11-01 BMO 0.55 -2.0% +0.94% +0.05% +4.78%

Is ENB (ENB) overvalued right now?

ENB (ENB) is currently trading at a trailing P/E of 21.3, sitting at the 18th percentile of its 5-year valuation history. A high percentile suggests the market is pricing the stock above its own historical norm — useful context before sizing a new position or selling premium against it.

ENB (ENB) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?

Selling cash-secured puts on ENB (ENB) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.

ENB (ENB) — which option strategy fits your view?

If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on ENB (ENB), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.

ENB (ENB) — is now a good entry?

Entry timing on ENB (ENB) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.

FAQ

Why does ENB show different P/E numbers on different sites?

Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.

Does this page show ENB's implied volatility?

Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.

How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's ENB page?

Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.