0700.HK (0700.HK)

Secondary decision view: valuation · portfolio context · the data you need before acting on a single-source signal.
Avoid

Despite Tencent (0700.HK) appearing statistically cheap on both earnings and book value metrics, structural issues with the underlying valuation floor and extreme implied volatility keep it in the AVO

  • Current P/E of HK$17.49 sits at the 19.6th percentile and P/B of HK$3.50 at the 9.0th percentile, both indicating a cheap historical reading and triggering a 'green' validation flag.
  • The primary downside floor estimate (HK$276.47) is unreliable because it's built on only one valid method, with warnings that the dividend and valuation floors are either regime-mixed or actually above the current price, removing a clear safety net.
  • Implied volatility (44.3%) ranks in the 97.3rd percentile over the past year, signaling extreme uncertainty that contradicts the calm implied by the low valuation alerts.
Verdict bucket from deterministic rule (validation / floor distance / risk alerts). LLM narration only — never picks the bucket.

BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal

HKD 453.20 HKD 276.47 engine floor
far above at floor

0700.HK is far above the floor (~63.9% above) — adding here means paying a premium vs. your own threshold. Wait or take partial position only with a strong directional view. valuation cheap (20th percentile)

RULES & ALERTS FIRING

Sign in to see which rules are firing on 0700.HK in your portfolio.
Sign in

VALUATION

Undervalued
🔥 Extreme-low valuation flag — historical bands suggest this ticker is unusually cheap relative to its own 5-year range.
Trailing P/E
17.5
5-yr percentile: 20%
P/B
3.5
5-yr percentile: 9%
p10
17.9
p25
18.5
p50
20.7
p75
22.8
p90
25.2
Sufficient earnings data; P/E historical percentile directly measures overvaluation or undervaluation

Floor Engine

AI Valuation Recommendation
Floor
HKD 276.12
Golden
HKD 298.21
How we derived this
Floor HKD 276.12 = 对 3 个有效估值方法的中位数选举:EPV HKD 276.47EPV_GROWTH_PREMIUM HKD 380.50PB HKD 234.10。引擎对每个方法的有效性做了独立检验(PE/股息分布是否结构性偏离、数据是否充分),只有通过的方法才参与最终选举。

Golden HKD 298.21 = Floor × 1.08(取在 floor → floor×1.30 收敛带内的最高 primary 值;若无候选落入此带,回落到 floor × 1.08 默认溢价)。

已跳过:DIVIDEND、VALUATION — 见各场景卡片下的具体原因。
External Cross-Check
Our AI Floor HKD 276.12
Analyst Low Target (42 brokers) HKD 425.23
Analyst Mean Target HKD 707.46
5-Year Low HKD 188.38
✓ 我们的 floor 比分析师低端低 35%(在合理区间内)。AI Floor 设计上就是『深度便宜』的价位,低于分析师 12 个月目标低端属于预期之内。
AI Synthesis
0700.HK 底价 USD 276.12 = 对 1 个有效估值方法的中位数选举:EPV USD 276.12。引擎对每种方法的有效性做了独立检验(PE/股息分布是否结构性偏离、数据是否充分),只有通过的方法才参与最终选举。置信度:低。
Updated 2026-05-02
Glossary (click to expand)
Forward P/E
P/E using analysts' next-12-month EPS estimates. More forward-looking than trailing P/E, but exposed to forecast error.
Trailing P/E
P/E using actual EPS from the last 12 months. Distorted by one-time events (asset sales, impairments) until they roll out of the window.
P/B (Price-to-Book)
Stock price / book value per share. Meaningful for asset-driven sectors (banks, insurers); high values are normal for asset-light sectors (tech, consumer).
PEG
P/E ÷ earnings growth rate — \"how much P/E you pay per 1% of growth\". <1 = cheap-ish, >2 = priced-in.
Regime-mismatch drawdown model
When P/E distribution undergoes a structural shift (business transformation, sector re-rating), traditional \"revert to historical P/E percentile\" misleads. This model uses historical max drawdown × current EPS instead.
EPV (Earnings Power Value)
Greenwald framework: assume zero growth + current earning power is sustainable. Yields a conservative lower bound (asset + franchise value).
Heuristic Fallback
Backup estimator used when the primary method (P/E percentile, yield reversion, etc.) is unreliable due to data issues. **Lower confidence** — reference only, not auto-execute.
Confidence
Primary method applicable → high; multiple methods agree → medium; single heuristic fallback → low. Low confidence means review before acting.
ideal HKD 453.20 Confidence low
discount-to-floor: 1.64×
DIVIDEND low
method skipped: dividend grew past historical regime (forward div 5.30 vs early 3y median implied div 0.61, ratio 8.69). Historical p95 yield was set when dividend was lower; fwd_div / p95_yield mixes regimes.
Yield reverts to historical 95th-percentile (extreme yield level)
VALUATION low
method skipped: stock is already pricing CHEAPER than its 5-year extreme — current PE 11.8× vs historical 5th-pct 20.4×. The PE-percentile formula gives 20.4× × EPS = 784.22, which is ABOVE the current price 453.20, making it a mean-reversion target (where the stock could rally TO), not a downside floor (where buyers would step in).
PE reverts to historical 5th-percentile (extreme undervaluation)
EPV high
HKD 276.47
Zero-growth scenario + current cash/debt (Greenwald franchise value)
5y ROIC 16% (>15%) + EPS CV 0.24 (<0.3) — high-ROIC stable, EPV franchise-value anchor applies
EPV GROWTH PREMIUM low
HKD 380.50
EPV × franchise-value multiplier (compounder premium when ROIC > WACC)
PB medium
HKD 234.10
P/B reverts to historical 10th-percentile (asset-driven businesses)

YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT

○ anonymous
What you'll see after sign-in
Your floor
$XXX.XX
Your golden
$XXX.XX
Market
XXX

· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price

· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds

· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio

Sign in to unlock →

IMPLIED VOLATILITY

CURRENT IV 44.3% HV (30D) 41.1% IV RANK (1Y) 97 HIGH
IV vs HV · last 1 year

Earnings Reactions

0700.HK
8 earnings events · last 2 years
Avg Gap%
-0.09%
Avg Day%
+0.92%
Up Hit Rate
38%
Next Earnings · est.
2026-08-12
in 63d
24-08
24-11
25-03
25-05
25-08
25-11
26-03
26-05
Bar height = |Gap%| normalized to the period max. Green = up, red = down.
Date Time EPS Surprise Gap% Day% Week%
2026-05-13 BMO 7.36 +1.8% -0.26% +1.18% -0.44%
2026-03-18 BMO 6.97 +1.5% -0.64% +0.09% -8.09%
2025-11-13 BMO 7.58 +7.7% -1.14% -0.15% -5.48%
2025-08-13 BMO 6.79 +4.6% +1.52% +4.74% +5.54%
2025-05-14 BMO 6.58 +3.9% +1.19% +2.96% +2.87%
2025-03-19 BMO 5.91 +5.6% +0.28% -0.18% -6.38%
2024-11-13 BMO 6.34 +11.2% -1.63% +0.00% +1.73%
2024-08-14 BMO 6.01 +17.1% +0.00% -1.27% -1.85%

Is 0700.HK (0700.HK) overvalued right now?

0700.HK (0700.HK) is currently trading at a trailing P/E of 17.5, sitting at the 20th percentile of its 5-year valuation history. A high percentile suggests the market is pricing the stock above its own historical norm — useful context before sizing a new position or selling premium against it.

0700.HK (0700.HK) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?

Selling cash-secured puts on 0700.HK (0700.HK) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.

0700.HK (0700.HK) — which option strategy fits your view?

If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on 0700.HK (0700.HK), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.

0700.HK (0700.HK) — is now a good entry?

Entry timing on 0700.HK (0700.HK) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.

FAQ

Why does 0700.HK show different P/E numbers on different sites?

Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.

Does this page show 0700.HK's implied volatility?

Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.

How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's 0700.HK page?

Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.